.png)
If you work in healthcare IT, you probably know this scene already.
It’s 4:30 pm, you’re on slide 27 of a vendor deck. There’s a “transformation journey” diagram, a wall of logos, and a bullet that promises “seamless integration with major EHRs.” Someone from security is squinting. Someone from clinical is checking the clock.
Everyone nods politely.
Six months later, you’re arguing over why test data isn’t representative and who owns the next round of go-live fixes.
So let’s skip the fantasy and talk about what actually helps when you’re picking a development partner — plus a bunch of names you’ll probably bump into anyway, with some honest context around them.
What really matters (and you won’t find on slide 3)
Forget the neat frameworks for a second. In practice, a few signals tell you more than any comparison table.
1. How they talk about rules when you don’t ask about rules
Every healthcare vendor has a “we’re compliant” slide. HIPAA, GDPR, some ISO, maybe SOC, job done.
Useful test: bring up something specific and slightly boring.
- Logs and PHI: “Where does protected data end up in your logs, and how do you scrub it?”
- Environments: “Show us prod vs staging vs dev. Who can see what?”
- Devices: “Have you dealt with MDR or FDA 21 CFR Part 820 before, and what did that break in your process?”
If the answers sound like they came from a brochure, you’ve learned plenty already.
2. Whether they’ve actually been through messy healthcare integrations
“We integrate with all major EHRs” translates to anything from “we wrote a proof-of-concept once” to “we’ve lived through three painful Epic go-lives and still have a client.”
Ask what “integrate” meant:
- Did they deal with HL7 / FHIR mappings, or did they just push CSVs around?
- Did they touch DICOM, lab systems, pharmacy systems, or just a single read-only API?
- What happened the first week after go-live? (If they skip straight to “everything went smoothly”, be suspicious.)
People who’ve actually lived it will talk about weird edge cases, bad test data, and that one clinical workflow nobody mentioned until UAT.
3. Whether AI and analytics are anchored in real workflows
Right now, everyone “leverages AI”. Models, predictions, magic.
Good question: “Show us where a nurse, a doctor, or a case manager sees this and decides something differently because of it.”
Gary Fritz from Stanford Health Care said he expects pretty much every app in their portfolio to end up with some sort of AI model. The point isn’t to decorate the product. It’s to take cognitive load off clinicians. If a vendor can’t connect their models to real decisions and fewer clicks, it’s just a slide.
4. If their delivery style matches your chaos level
A four-hospital system with a change board and strict CAB rules does not run projects like a Series A telehealth startup. And that’s fine. But your vendor has to be able to live in your world, not theirs.
- Startups: you need fast loops, direct access to engineers, feature flags, and the ability to throw away bad ideas.
- Big providers: you need predictable releases, testing rituals, internal security reviews, and enough documentation that people can sleep at night.
Ask vendors which side they’re more comfortable with. If they claim “we do everything” with zero nuance, that’s code for “we haven’t thought about this.”
Ten vendors you’ll keep hearing about — and where they really sit
Not a ranking. Not an endorsement list. Just: when you go vendor hunting, these names pop up a lot. Here’s the short version of how to think about them.
MEV – the engineering-first, “we live in regulated land” type
Let’s start at home.
MEV’s been in custom development for 20+ years, and a decent chunk of that is healthcare and other regulated spaces. We’re usually pulled in when:
- there’s PHI everywhere and someone needs to design an architecture that won’t implode during audit;
- IoMT devices are throwing off data that actually needs to land somewhere useful;
- workloads are stuck on-prem and everyone secretly wants them in a sane cloud setup;
- a product team wants an “innovation lab” pace without forgetting HIPAA exists.
We obsess over logs, access patterns, infrastructure as code, and how new features behave under real load, not just demo conditions. If you want layers of “client success” before you see an engineer, we’re probably not your team. If you want to argue about data flows on a whiteboard with the people who’ll actually build the thing, that’s us.
The “bring your auditor” club: ScienceSoft and Itransition
These two live where the paperwork is heavy and no one blinks at a 100-page validation pack.
- ScienceSoft
Shows up when certifications are front and center. Think ISO 13485, 27001, 9001, plus all the usual healthcare regs. They’ve touched EHR/EMR, telemedicine, analytics, portals, and device-adjacent software. Strong when your internal compliance team is basically a co-author on the spec. - Itransition
More on the “we have a forest of old systems and want to modernize without burning the place down” side. Big estates: hospital systems, portals, CRM, lab/pharmacy, reporting. They live in the world of multi-year modernization and constant integration headaches.
If your security lead is in every meeting and you’re planning a roadmap in years, not quarters, you’ll probably end up talking to one of these.
Data-heavy: ELEKS
If you say, “We have a ton of data and we’re mostly using it for dashboard wallpaper,” ELEKS is the kind of vendor that lands on your shortlist.
They’re very at home with:
- building healthcare data platforms;
- predictive models and risk scores;
- analytics that are supposed to change actual behavior, not just color a chart.
They also touch EHR and telehealth, but the interesting stuff is where they turn data into something clinicians or ops teams can act on without needing a PhD in stats.
“We’ll run your day-to-day stack”: ITRex Group
ITRex is the “we do a bit of everything you actually run” partner.
EMR/EHR, practice management, lab systems, remote patient monitoring, decision support — a lot of the unglamorous but vital plumbing. Often, they become the default shop for several related projects, which at least keeps UX and integrations from fracturing completely.
If your roadmap is “make clinic operations less painful” plus “do something sensible with RPM”, this type of vendor can be handy.
Device-centric: GloriumTech and Arkenea
Different lane now: when your product starts with a device, not a hospital IT system.
- GloriumTech
Strong medtech/biotech flavor. They’re around when you’re building software that hugs a device closely: companion apps, device data handling, clinician consoles tied to a piece of hardware. - Arkenea
Lives at the intersection of telemedicine, patient portals, and device-aware software. They’ve got plenty of experience in standards and regs on that side, so useful if you’re juggling both MDR/FDA type concerns and “will patients actually use this app?” in the same project.
If your first diagram has a physical device in the middle, you’re in this bucket.
Small, nerdy about standards: SumatoSoft
SumatoSoft is the boutique option. Smaller, flexible, but surprisingly deep on healthcare specifics:
- HIPAA-aware apps;
- FHIR / HL7 interfaces;
- EHR add-ons;
- telemedicine and analytics bits.
Good if you want a team that will happily argue about FHIR resource design and message formats without trying to turn it into a six-month consulting engagement.
Budget-sensitive, mobile-heavy: Moon Technolabs
Moon Technolabs often shows up when the budget is real-world and there’s a big mobile component:
- telemedicine apps;
- general patient-facing apps;
- wellness platforms;
- cleaning up older health applications.
They do the usual compliance work; the real question with any cost-sensitive global player is what support and maintenance look like once v1 is out the door. That’s worth pinning down early.
Product-driven digital health builds: Orangesoft
Orangesoft works a lot with funded startups and mid-sized healthcare companies that act like product orgs, not IT departments.
Telemedicine, RPM, wellness, mental health — plus modern web/mobile, some AI/LLM integration, and IoT/IoMT. They also speak the language of investors and clinical stakeholders, which makes them handy when you’re trying to keep both happy.
If your biggest questions are “how do we ship v1, find product-market fit, and not get wrecked by regulators,” they’re the pattern match.
How to cut through the noise (without a 40-column spreadsheet)
At some point you have five vendors who all “do HL7, AI, security, and cloud” and you need to pick two for serious talks. A few small moves help more than another round of RFP revisions.
Ask for one ugly story.
“Tell us about a healthcare project that went sideways and what you changed because of it.” You’re not looking for perfection. You’re listening for honesty, detail, and ownership. If all you get is “we always learn and improve”, that’s not an answer.
Draw your world on a whiteboard.
Rough diagram. Systems, data flows, known pain points. Then shut up and let them respond.
Good signs:
- they ask questions you wish your own team had asked earlier;
- they point at the places that will probably break first;
- they propose a first slice you could realistically ship.
Put the right people in the room.
Invite a clinician, someone from compliance/security, and someone who owns the budget. See if the vendor can keep all three engaged. If they lose clinical staff with jargon or annoy security with hand-wavy answers, that’s your preview of the next two years.
Push the conversation past version one.
Everyone loves talking about launch. Ask what happens when:
- a new regulation lands;
- you expand into another region;
- usage doubles;
- you need to “sunset” an old module.
If their answer is basically “we’ll handle it in support”, keep digging.
Conclusion
MEV, ScienceSoft, Itransition, ELEKS, ITRex Group, GloriumTech, Arkenea, SumatoSoft, Moon Technolabs, Orangesoft — they all have real work behind them, in slightly different shapes. None of them is universally “the best.”
What you can do is tilt the odds in your favor:
- favor teams who treat regulation as part of architecture, not decoration;
- insist on concrete stories, not just acronym lists;
- watch how they talk to clinicians and auditors in the same conversation;
- and pick the partner whose roadmap for your mess makes uncomfortable sense.
Do that, and the logo on the slide matters a lot less than the reality of the next go-live.
.webp)
