Series B Tech Audit: What to Fix Before You Raise Funding

Series B funding is about execution. Investors want to see that your product is stable, your team can ship reliably, and your systems can handle growth. This article outlines the key technical areas to audit before raising your Series B round — so you can identify risks early, reduce execution gaps, and protect your valuation.

Why Series B Requires a Different Kind of Readiness

Series B is not a continuation of Series A. It’s a shift from proving your product works to proving your company can scale. Investors are no longer buying potential — they’re assessing operational maturity.

Many startups struggle at this stage. Early technical decisions that worked for small teams and limited users often start breaking under pressure. Missed launches, outages, and slow velocity become red flags.

Series B on the horizon?

Let’s stress-test your tech →

Book a free consultation →

This is where funding gets harder. Without clear signs of execution readiness, even strong companies can lose momentum. A focused tech audit helps you find and fix the gaps before they derail your raise.

Where Execution Breaks Before Series B

One of the top reasons why startups fail after Series A is execution risk. Startups that moved fast early on start to hit limits: missed roadmaps, increasing support load, and unpredictable releases.

Teams spend more time fixing bugs than shipping features. Systems start failing under load. Engineers burn out keeping the platform stable, while new development stalls.

These breakdowns don’t appear in pitch decks, but they show up in investor diligence — and they’re easy to miss without a pre-raise audit.

How Tech Debt Impacts Business Outcomes

At Series B, teams are expected to move fast and deliver reliably. Tech debt makes that difficult.

Productivity drops as engineers spend more time fixing regressions and maintaining unstable systems. New features take longer to ship, and quality declines.

Maintenance costs rise. Minor changes require deep workarounds. Core systems become harder to support without breaking something else.

Launches get delayed. Revenue is lost when the team can’t deliver what sales promised. Tech debt directly slows down execution and puts the next stage of growth at risk.

Key Architectural Blocks to Scaling Beyond Series B

When Architecture Blocks Series B Growth

Tech debt often signals deeper architectural problems. At Series B funding, you need systems that support higher traffic, faster delivery, and new feature development without constant risk.

Key signs:

Releases fail or cause downtime as usage grows
New features require risky changes to core systems
Infrastructure scaling requires manual work or patching
Engineers spend time stabilizing, not shipping

These issues limit how fast you can grow, increase operational cost, and reduce investor confidence. Before raising, validate that your architecture can support the next stage — not just survive the current one.

Delivery and Deployment Gaps That Block Series B Readiness

By the time you’re approaching Series B, shipping software should be a routine process — not a high-risk event. But for many startups, this is where things start to break.

Releases still happen manually, often late in the day, with multiple people watching just in case something goes wrong. There’s no clear visibility into what’s deployed, what failed, or why performance dropped. Teams find out about issues from users — not from alerts.

When something does go wrong, rollbacks aren’t immediate. Recovery is slow. Instead of moving forward, engineers are pulled into constant cleanup. This cycle slows down velocity and creates internal friction.

Investors notice these patterns quickly. If your team can’t deliver consistently or explain how you track and manage releases, it raises concerns about execution at scale. At Series B, process maturity matters as much as product-market fit.

What Investors Expect to See at Series B

Weak delivery processes raise questions. Series B investors want to know those issues are resolved.

They expect to see that your team can ship reliably, monitor production, and respond quickly to issues. Releases should be routine, not risky.

They also look for evidence that your product can scale. This includes a clear technical roadmap, stable infrastructure, and the ability to support growth without major changes.

Uncertainty is a red flag. If there are gaps in your architecture, processes, or team, investors will find them. The more you surface and address these issues up front, the more confident they’ll be in your ability to execute.

Engineering Health Snapshot

Area	What Good Looks Like	Why It Matters	What Signals Risk
Architecture	Modular, API-driven, able to support 10× growth with no full rewrite	Shows platform can scale without blocking new features	Monolith, manual scaling, critical rewrites in roadmap
Deployment	CI/CD in place, <15 min rollback, fully automated, no late-night releases	Enables fast, safe delivery, reduces downtime risk	Manual pushes, weekend releases, no rollback tested
Monitoring & Alerts	Logs, metrics, alerts set up and actively used (e.g., Datadog, Sentry, Grafana)	Detects issues before customers do	No monitoring or only post-incident analysis
Code Quality	60–80% unit test coverage on core services, enforced reviews, static analysis tools used	Reduces regressions, makes team velocity predictable	Fragile areas known but unaddressed, no test coverage tracked
Velocity	Measurable sprint throughput, >70% delivery-to-commit ratio, predictable releases	Reflects execution capability, investor confidence in roadmap	Repeated carryovers, launch delays, unclear priorities
Tech Debt	Documented, mapped by system impact and business cost, remediation plan in place	Shows maturity, protects burn and delivery capacity	“We’ll fix it later” attitude, no tracking or owner
Team Structure	Balanced team (engineering, QA, DevOps), minimal key-person risk, onboarding <2 weeks	Indicates the org can absorb growth without breaking	1–2 people own critical systems, no hiring plan
Hiring Readiness	Time-to-fill <30 days for key roles, clear JD, attractive stack	Shows ability to scale team when funding hits	Open roles for months, niche tech blocking growth
Security	MFA, access control, secure environments, SOC 2 in progress (if needed)	Protects IP and avoids diligence delays	Weak access controls, exposed endpoints, no internal reviews
Roadmap & Infra Plan	12–18 month roadmap with tech milestones, infra scaling plan documented	Aligns tech plans with business goals, reduces surprise risks	No documented scale targets, unclear ownership

‍

How to Run a Targeted Tech Audit

If you know what investors expect, your audit should focus on proving it.

Start with four areas:

Architecture: Can the system scale without major rework?
Delivery: Can the team ship reliably and recover fast?
Velocity: Are you executing on the roadmap without delays?
Team: Do you have the right structure and capacity to support growth?

Keep the audit short, direct, and tied to business outcomes. Identify blockers to scale, not code-level issues.

Use clear metrics and prioritized findings. Link every issue to risk (timeline, cost, reliability) and show how you're addressing it. The goal is to demonstrate readiness, not perfection.

How to Act on Audit Results

Once the audit is done, the next step is execution. Don’t try to fix everything — focus on what puts your Series B round or roadmap at risk.

Start by prioritizing issues based on business impact:

Will it delay a key feature or customer launch?
Will it slow down hiring or onboarding?
Will it show up in investor diligence?

Plan targeted, time-boxed refactoring sprints to address the highest-risk items. Fix what affects delivery speed, stability, or ability to scale.

If your internal team doesn’t have capacity — or if the issues require specific expertise — bring in outside support. Delays caused by unresolved tech debt or system gaps are more expensive than short-term help.

Acting on audit results shows you’re in control — and that’s what investors want to see.

Series B Tech Audit & Action Plan

Audit Findings → Actions

Area	What to Audit	What to Do with Results
Architecture	Peak CPU, memory, DB usage under load Latency in core services and APIs Shared-state or tightly coupled components	Break out high-risk components (e.g., auth, payments) into services Add caching or queuing where needed Remove blockers to roadmap scalability
Delivery	Deployment frequency and failure rate Manual steps in release process Average rollback time and availability of staging parity	Automate all releases via CI/CD (e.g., GitHub Actions, CircleCI) Set up staging with production parity Enable tested rollback in < 10 minutes
Velocity	Sprint velocity vs. plan over last 4 sprints Cycle time from commit to production Bug-to-feature ratio in release notes	Reassign support-heavy engineers to roadmap items Cut or delay low-priority features Add QA/test coverage where bugs slow delivery
Tech Debt	Top 3 components with frequent bugs or missed estimates Areas flagged in prior retros or code comments Non-versioned legacy code	Prioritize debt in core revenue paths Run 1–2 week cleanup sprints post-audit Ignore low-impact debt until post-raise
Team	Ownership of critical systems Single points of failure (e.g., only one person knows how it works) Dependency on overextended leads	Assign backups or rotate ownership Document handoffs and systems Initiate cross-training or split roles early
Hiring Gaps	Open critical roles > 30 days Blocked features due to missing roles (e.g., no DevOps) Time to onboard new hires	Hire short-term contractors to unblock Pause non-essential projects Add hiring plan with timelines to fundraising materials
Security & Ops	MFA, access controls, and role-based permissions Presence of monitoring and uptime alerts Pager setup for incidents	Enforce MFA across staging and prod Add uptime alerts for all public services Define incident response owner and process
Audit Output	1-page summary of risks by area with business impact Timeline and owner for each issue Clear status: fix now vs. post-raise	Share investor-facing summary in diligence deck Use internal plan to track progress weekly Flag items that require external support or budget

Conclusion: Before Series B, Prove You’re Ready

Series B is a checkpoint for operational maturity. It’s where investors shift their focus from potential to performance — and from product-market fit to execution risk.

If your systems are unstable, your delivery is unpredictable, or your team is stretched thin, it will show up in diligence. And it will affect your valuation, timeline, or ability to close the round.

A targeted tech audit helps you find and address these issues early. Focus on what blocks growth, what slows delivery, and what creates risk. Use the findings to align your roadmap, guide internal priorities, and strengthen your investor narrative.

So audit early, act fast, and raise with confidence.

‍

MEV team

Software development company

Series B Financing Readiness: What to Audit and Why It Matters