Healthcare data already accounts for nearly 30 % of the world’s generated data—and it’s on track to grow at about 36 % annually through 2025.
A Healthy Outlook for Data
Yet, simply having data does nothing by itself. The question for payers, providers and vendors is: how do you manage that volume, variety and velocity in a way that actually supports care, cost and compliance? This article highlights seven specialised providers that deliver healthcare data management solutions and offers a comparative view of their services, technologies, and specialized providers that deliver healthcare data management market presence to help you select the right partner.
How We Selected Providers
For this ranking of top-7 companies in the “Healthcare Data Management Solutions” space, we used a consistent evaluation framework. Here’s how we determined which providers make the list:
Healthcare Data Management Service Providers: Evaluation Criteria
Relevance to Healthcare Data Management We looked for evidence that the service covers core functions of healthcare data management — for example: data collection, governance, integration, storage, analytics, and compliance etc.
Regulatory & Industry Context Providers needed to demonstrate awareness of healthcare-specific requirements (such as data quality, interoperability, provider/patient data, and compliance obligations) because the complexity of healthcare data is frequently driven by regulatory and system fragmentation issues.
Public-Facing Transparency We required that providers publish enough detail on their site to allow reasonable comparison: mission, service description, industry focus, or case studies. That transparency helps ensure their offering is real, not just marketing.
Using these criteria, we filtered and ranked firms to find those that are comparable to your organisation (a software development partner providing healthcare data-management services) and publicly committed to that product category. The following profiles adhere to those standards.
Top 7 Providers for Healthcare Data Management: Deep Dives and Key Comparisons
Top 7 Providers for Healthcare Data Management
1. Dimensional Strategies Inc. (DSI)
DSI supports healthcare organizations in managing data through a Microsoft-powered platform built for security, interoperability and operational insight. Their work spans EHR and lab data integration, real-time analytics, and governance frameworks aligned with HIPAA and GDPR. Core strengths:
Microsoft Azure/Fabric infrastructure for healthcare data pipelines
End-to-end integration of patient, device and care data
Data quality, deduplication and standardization workflows
Compliance controls, audit trails and encryption built in
Why This Profile Matters: When a healthcare provider or payer needs a robust platform backed by a major technology stack and requiring strict regulatory compliance, DSI offers a proven engineering foundation rather than a plug-in solution.
2. Semarchy
Semarchy addresses master data and unified data challenges in healthcare by offering a platform designed to bring together patient, provider and product data for operations, research and compliance. Their emphasis: breaking down data silos, improving governance, and accelerating insights. Core strengths:
Master-data management (MDM) for patient, provider and product domains
Unified, trusted data hubs enabling analytics and real-time perspective
Governance workflows and compliance built into the platform
Rapid deployment and scale with agile delivery models
Why This Profile Matters: In situations where data is fragmented—records duplicated, multiple systems in play, inconsistent provider or patient data—Semarchy becomes a strategic partner to establish a “single source of truth” across the healthcare enterprise.
3. MEV
MEV works with payers, PBMs, health insurers, pharma companies, and digital-health platforms to unify healthcare data for compliant and accurate operations. Their focus spans eligibility, claims, pharmacy, and clinical workflows — especially in environments with fragmented or inconsistent data.
Core strengths:
Payer/PBM data unification: harmonizing plan, benefit, coverage, and formulary data for fewer denials and stronger billing accuracy.
Master-data creation: patient identity resolution, provider directory management, registries for facilities and connected devices.
Interoperability: integrations with Epic, Cerner, Athena; support for HL7, FHIR, CDA, X12; middleware like Mirth and Redox.
Modern data platforms: Snowflake/BigQuery/Redshift, ETL/ELT pipelines, real-time data streaming, unified API access.
Analytics enablement: dashboards for payers/providers, cost and claims analytics, predictive modeling.
Why This Profile Matters: When an organisation faces fragmented clinical and operational data spread across payers, PBMs, plans and providers—with regulatory, interoperability and analytics demands—MEV presents an engineering-partner model that addresses all those layers. Their publicly shown capabilities align with building full-lifecycle data systems in healthcare, rather than simply adding one off-the-shelf module.
4. Experion Technologies
Experion positions its offering around secure and efficient handling of patient records, lab results and clinical workflows through custom engineering for healthcare organisations. Their services span data-and-AI, product engineering, and analytics built for healthcare systems. Core strengths:
Product engineering expertise in data/AI for clinical, operational and research settings.
Global delivery footprint, ISO 27001 and SOC2 compliant operations.
Why This Profile Matters: When an organisation needs a partner to build or scale complex healthcare-data platforms (not just buy a module), Experion offers full engineering depth with healthcare domain focus.
5. Pure Storage
Pure Storage frames its value proposition as accelerating the entire “healthcare data management landscape” by powering EHRs, enterprise imaging, genomics workflows, payer systems and AI workloads in healthcare. Core strengths:
High-performance infrastructure for healthcare workloads: EHR, imaging, genomics, payer systems.
Hybrid/cloud-ready architecture with strong cyber-resilience and performance optimisation.
AI-readiness for healthcare analytics and real-time insights.
Why This Profile Matters: Healthcare organisations with massive data volumes (imaging, genomics, scale analytics) and critical infrastructure demands can rely on Pure Storage’s platform-first model rather than purely software-centric solutions.
6. Beda Software
Beda Software brands itself as a health-IT team delivering “Healthcare Data Management Solutions, powered by AI.” Their offering includes FHIR-native EHR systems, voice-driven data capture, pre-screening assessments and analytics platforms for healthcare. Core strengths:
FHIR-native EHR and healthcare-data platforms tailored to digital health workflows.
AI/NLP capabilities (voice capture, automation) for clinical and operational data flows.
Interoperability and regulatory alignment built into the platform architecture.
Why This Profile Matters: For digital-health companies or healthcare providers looking to adopt modern EHR/data models and embed AI/NLP capabilities early, Beda offers a focused, purpose-built approach rather than generic data tools.
7. Noetyx
Noetyx delivers tailored healthcare-data-management solutions emphasising data integration, analytics, decision-support and operational insight. Their services span custom pipelines, analytic frameworks and data-unification for pharma, life sciences and healthcare organisations. Core strengths:
Custom pipelines and data-integration services built for heterogeneous healthcare data sources.
Analytics-driven insights for pharmaceutical and life-sciences clients.
Agile software and data delivery model with ROI and scalability focus.
Why This Profile Matters: When your data challenge involves multiple disparate systems (claims, formulary, provider, device data) and you need a tailored engineering partner to build the unification and analytics layer, Noetyx fits the bill.
• FHIR-native EHR platforms
• Digital-health data systems
• AI/NLP-driven workflows
• Interoperability solutions
• FHIR-first architecture
• Voice/NLP data capture
• Data analytics engines
• Digital-health EHR builds
• Voice-driven clinical documentation
Noetyx
• Custom pipelines
• Data unification
• Analytics & insights
• Decision-support systems
• Custom ETL/ELT
• Pharma & health analytics frameworks
• Scalable delivery model
• Pharma analytics systems
• Multi-source healthcare data integration
Conclusion
Healthcare organizations generate enormous amounts of information, but the value of that information depends on how well it is organized, connected, and governed. The companies in this overview represent different strengths across that spectrum: MDM, interoperability, infrastructure, analytics, and full-stack engineering. Each provider approaches healthcare data from a specific angle, and that variety gives teams the flexibility to choose a partner that fits their technical environment and regulatory obligations.
When comparing options, focus on the parts of your ecosystem that create the most friction—data quality issues, disconnected systems, heavy workloads, or reporting limitations. Match those needs to the strengths of the vendors in the matrix. With a clear view of your data landscape and the capabilities of each provider, it becomes much easier to choose a partner who will support your roadmap and help your organization run on cleaner, more dependable data.
FAQ: Choosing Healthcare Data Management and Integration Partners in 2025
When you search for healthcare data management companies, you usually want firms that:
Handle ingestion from EHR, claims, PBM, lab, imaging, and device feeds
Provide data quality, deduplication, and normalization
Support governance, access controls, and auditability
Understand healthcare standards and codesets, not only generic ETL
The report highlights seven providers that fit those criteria from different angles:
DSI (Microsoft-centric pipelines, governance, and analytics)
Semarchy (healthcare master data management)
MEV (payer, PBM, and interoperability engineering)
Experion (custom platforms for providers and labs)
Pure Storage (storage tuned for EHR, imaging, and genomics)
Beda Software (FHIR-native EHR and data platforms)
Noetyx (pharma and life science analytics and integration)
They sit in different spots on the data stack, so the best fit depends on whether your main pain is pipelines, MDM, storage, analytics, or product delivery.
For “top healthcare data integration companies 2025,” focus on vendors that can:
Work with HL7, FHIR, CDA, X12, and EDI feeds
Integrate with EHRs (Epic, Cerner, Athena) and lab systems
Support batch ETL, streaming, and API-level access
Maintain lineage and monitoring across the pipeline
In the report:
DSI uses Azure and Fabric for secure pipelines and interoperability, with encryption and audit controls built in.
MEV builds multi-feed data platforms on Snowflake/BigQuery/Redshift plus HL7/FHIR/CDA/X12 via Mirth, Rhapsody, Redox, and EHR connections.
Noetyx delivers custom integration pipelines across claims, formulary, provider, and device data for pharma and healthcare.
These three cover most “healthcare data integration platforms 2025” needs across different segments.
For unified analytics across multiple EHRs, look for:
Connectors/APIs for major EHRs
A consistent data model (FHIR or a canonical schema)
Data quality rules for encounters, problems, meds, labs, imaging
Integration with your existing BI/ML stack
In the report, combinations often appear:
DSI uses Microsoft-based data fabrics that combine EHR + lab data and feed analytics.
MEV implements FHIR apps on Azure plus shared warehouses for claims/clinical data, then builds dashboards and models.
Beda Software offers FHIR-native EHR platforms that can serve as a primary source for analytics in digital health.
For multi-EHR landscapes, a blended stack is common: an MDM/FHIR hub (Semarchy or Beda), pipelines/warehouses (DSI, MEV, Noetyx), then BI/ML layers.
Healthcare MDM and metadata tools typically cover:
Patient, provider, and product identities
Hierarchies (locations, orgs, networks)
Reference data (plans, formularies, codesets)
Stewardship workflows and approvals
The report highlights Semarchy as a central MDM platform with a strong healthcare story: patient/provider/product domains, governance workflows, and fast deployment.
MEV applies healthcare-specific MDM patterns (hMDM) for patient identity, provider directories, and device registries on top of Snowflake/BigQuery, combining platform + custom work.
For provider data management, look for:
Integration with credentialing, scheduling, EHR, claims, directory feeds
Matching and survivorship rules for provider records
Network/specialty/affiliation/plan-level attributes support
Workflows for updates, attestations, and audits
In the report, Semarchy and MEV cover this space differently: Semarchy offers MDM templates suited to provider data; MEV builds registries, directories, and network graphs as part of broader payer/PBM platforms.
Ask for a demo that follows a provider record from raw sources through matching, stewardship, and downstream publication.
Patient identity resolution tools should:
Handle multiple identifiers across EHR, lab, claims, PBM, devices, portals
Use deterministic and probabilistic matching
Provide tuning and explainability for privacy and data teams
Integrate with MDM and FHIR layers
In the report, MEV lists patient identity resolution and healthcare-specific MDM as a core service, including tokenization and PHI-aware pipelines.
You can pair a service provider with off-the-shelf matching engines—or rely on a custom approach when your environment is highly fragmented.
For governance and compliance, aim for partners that provide:
Clear ownership of data domains
Glossaries, policies, and steward roles
Technical lineage from ingestion → transforms → outputs
Role-based access controls and detailed audit logs
In the report:
DSI builds governance frameworks with encryption and audit trails inside Azure-based pipelines.
Semarchy ships governance and stewardship workflows via its xDM platform.
MEV focuses on HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, SOC 2, HITRUST, and ISO/IEC 27001 requirements with lineage and access logging.
Ask to see how policies appear in the tools (lineage views tied to real tables, jobs, and access rules), not only in docs.
Look for services that:
Map codes to ICD, SNOMED CT, LOINC, RxNorm, NDC
Normalize units and ranges for vitals and labs
Structure unstructured notes with NLP where it’s worth it
Store normalized data in FHIR resources or analytics-friendly canonical models
The report notes MEV and Noetyx build pipelines for standardization and longitudinal views across claims, formulary, and clinical feeds.
Ask them to walk through a sample patient journey and show how identifiers, visits, codes, and outcomes get reconciled.
Consider:
How it connects to EHR, claims, and operational systems
Support for quality metrics, financial performance, and operational dashboards
Ability to push insights back into workflows (not only dashboards)
Predictive models with governance around how models are used
In the top list, DSI, MEV, Experion, and Noetyx all have analytics stories in different segments.
For providers, ask for examples where outcomes moved (readmissions, throughput, margin, or quality measures).
Look for platforms that support:
X12 eligibility/claims and contract feeds
FHIR/HL7 for clinical data
Reconciliation for members, providers, and contracts
Monitoring + alerting for delays and errors
MEV focuses on payer, PBM, and payer–provider integration (eligibility, coverage, claims, EHR linkage). Noetyx supports multi-party pharma/payer analytics.
Ask for one collaboration case where their stack improved timeliness or reduced disputes.
Examine ROI through:
Reduced manual reconciliation
Improved quality and contract metrics
Lower integration and maintenance costs over time
Faster time-to-insight for new use cases
The report positions Pure Storage as infrastructure that reduces storage overhead and performance bottlenecks for imaging/genomics/EHR workloads, while DSI, MEV, and Noetyx tie integration + analytics work to operational and financial gains.
Ask for before/after examples with numbers (even approximate) and what was measured.
Seek storage platforms with:
Support for EHR, PACS, imaging, genomics, and archive workloads
Cyber-resilience (snapshots, immutability options) and rapid restore
Cloud + hybrid integration
Alignment with HIPAA and regional privacy laws
The report includes Pure Storage as a healthcare-focused infrastructure vendor for EHR, imaging, genomics, and AI workloads.
Service firms like DSI, MEV, and Experion often design platforms on top of these layers, combining infra with governance and analytics.
Pipelines combining clinical, claims, and commercial data
From the report:
Noetyx focuses on pharma/life sciences analytics and integration.
MEV supports pharma commercial analytics and healthcare data integration.
DSI and Experion support clinical/research workloads through their platforms.
Ask how they handle cohort selection, study versioning, and privacy controls for research data.
Expect to see:
Cloud warehouses (Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift)
Lakehouse / data fabric patterns on major clouds
Interoperability standards (HL7, FHIR, DICOM) and common codesets
Orchestration tools for ETL and streaming
ML/AI platforms integrated with these layers
The report describes MEV using Snowflake/BigQuery/Redshift plus streaming and unified APIs, while DSI leans on Azure and Fabric. Noetyx uses custom ETL and scalable analytics frameworks.
Match technology choices to your existing cloud strategy and compliance obligations.
The seven providers play distinct roles:
Dimensional Strategies Inc. (DSI): Microsoft-centric integration, governance, and analytics for EHR/lab data.
Semarchy: MDM for patient/provider/product with stewardship workflows and unified hubs.
MEV: Engineering partner for payer/PBM/pharma/digital health platforms: multi-feed integration, hMDM, FHIR, analytics.
Experion: Custom healthcare data platforms and clinical workflow solutions with ISO 27001 and SOC 2 delivery.
Pure Storage: Storage + infrastructure for EHR, imaging, genomics, and AI workloads.
Beda Software: FHIR-native EHR and digital health data platforms with AI/NLP-driven workflows.
Noetyx: Custom pipelines and analytics for pharma/life sciences and multi-source environments.
Use this as a mapping exercise: which part hurts most right now—identity, pipelines, analytics, storage, or product engineering.
A simple evaluation pattern helps:
Scope fit: which parts match their public work (EHR integration, PBM, research, genomics, payer analytics).
Privacy is important to us, so you have the option of disabling certain types of storage that may not be necessary for the basic functioning of the website. Blocking categories may impact your experience on the website. More information
.png)
.png)
.png)
